Law & Justice

Collegium recommends six judges for appointment as High Court Chief Justices

Supreme Court Collegium recommends six judges for appointment as High Court Chief Justices

By Rida Staff

Published:Sun Dec 21 2025 05:30:00 GMT+0530 (India Standard Time)

The Indian Express

Institutional–Process Ruru

1 5 10

Intensity

Summary

New Delhi, 19 December 2025: The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended a significant round of leadership changes in the High Courts, proposing six Chief Justice appointments/transfers across the country. The reshuffle is driven largely by imminent retirements of incumbent Chief Justices in early January 2026 and is intended to ensure continuity in judicial administration at a time when High Courts are handling heavy pendency and sensitive constitutional litigation.

Why this is happening now — and how the system works

In India, the Chief Justice of a High Court is not only the senior-most judicial authority of that court but also its administrative head—responsible for roster allocation, constituting benches, and day-to-day court governance. The Collegium’s recommendations are forwarded to the Union government for processing and formal appointment.

The Key Recommendations (with context and what’s notable)

Kerala High Court: The Collegium has recommended Justice Soumen Sen (currently Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court) to be transferred as Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court, as the incumbent Chief Justice Justice Nitin Jamdar is due to retire on 9 January 2026.

Why this appointment draws attention: Justice Sen’s name is still associated in public memory with an unusual “judge vs judge” episode from January 2024 in the Calcutta High Court, where another judge made allegations against him in the context of conflicting orders, prompting the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognisance and intervene to address issues of institutional discipline. This episode did not amount to a finding against Justice Sen in the reporting, but it remains a rare and high-visibility institutional flashpoint linked to his earlier judicial tenure.

Meghalaya High Court: To succeed Justice Sen in Meghalaya, the Collegium has recommended Justice Revati P. Mohite Dere (Bombay High Court) as Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court.

Adjudication “flavour”: Justice Mohite Dere is widely known for rulings involving custodial deaths, police accountability, and matters touching women’s rights and access to religious spaces (including litigation relating to women’s entry at Haji Ali). The recommendation is also institutionally significant because it would make her one of the very few women Chief Justices of High Courts at present.

Uttarakhand High Court: Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta (Allahabad High Court) has been recommended as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court, where the incumbent Justice G. Narendar is due to retire on 9 January.
Jharkhand High Court: Justice M. S. Sonak (Bombay High Court) has been recommended as Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court, as the incumbent Chief Justice Justice Tarlok Singh is due to retire on 8 January 2026.

Adjudication “flavour”: Justice Sonak has drawn notice for orders across constitutional and administrative law themes, and for high-visibility rights-and-process observations in criminal procedure (including remarks emphasising that trial courts must remain independent and fair, not act as prosecution mouthpieces). Separately, he has also attracted public attention for personal institutional messaging—such as being among the earliest in Goa’s legal community to publicly register a living will to encourage awareness of end-of-life planning.

Sikkim High Court: The Collegium has recommended Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque (Kerala High Court) as Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court.

Why this one is institutionally sensitive: Credible reporting indicates the recommendation comes amid a recent Sikkim High Court administrative episode (“row”) that reportedly influenced the Collegium’s choice not to favour another senior judge for regular appointment as Chief Justice. In that backdrop, Justice Mustaque’s recommendation is being read as a stabilising choice to restore normal administrative functioning.

Patna High Court: The Collegium has recommended Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo (Orissa High Court) as Chief Justice of the Patna High Court.

Why this matters

Leadership transitions at the level of Chief Justices can materially influence how a High Court functions—case listing priorities, roster management, administrative discipline, and the pace of disposal. Beyond the routine succession logic, this round also contains two storylines that will be watched closely:

whether a high-profile institutional episode linked to Justice Sen’s earlier judicial environment continues to colour public perception as he moves to Kerala, and
whether the Sikkim appointment helps reset administrative stability after recent turbulence.

Expand

Outlet-Wise Coverage Analysis | Ruru Ratings

Outlet	Ruru Ratings	Intensity
The Indian Express	Institutional–Process Ruru	4
Notes and Context: The report focuses on the Collegium’s decisions, profiles of the recommended judges, and the retirement-driven rationale behind the reshuffle, maintaining a factual and process-oriented tone.

Comparative Analysis

Convergence:

With a single outlet in this cluster, convergence is internal. The article consistently links retirements, seniority, and judicial administration as the core drivers of the Collegium’s recommendations.

Frame Divergence:

There is no cross-outlet divergence. Within the article, however, a contrast emerges between routine succession-driven appointments and a few elevations that carry symbolic weight, particularly in terms of women’s representation and judges known for rights-oriented jurisprudence.

Quote Spectrum

Rida Synthesis

This round of Collegium recommendations reflects the judiciary’s effort to manage leadership transitions proactively while balancing seniority, administrative experience, and institutional credibility. As these judges assume charge, their administrative choices and judicial philosophies will quietly but decisively shape the functioning of several High Courts at a moment of heightened constitutional and public scrutiny.

Disclaimer: The analysis, assessments, and comparative interpretations presented above are based on a good-faith, editorial evaluation of publicly available news reports from the referenced outlets. All Ruru ratings, tone/framing observations, and analytical inferences are inherently subjective and reflect Rida’s structured rubric-based methodology rather than any claim of definitive accuracy or intent of the underlying publishers. Readers are encouraged to consult the original articles and primary sources to form their own independent understanding of the events, viewpoints, and narratives discussed. Nothing in this document should be construed as attributing motives, endorsing any political or institutional position, or making any factual representation beyond what is contained in the cited material.